11 Dec 2006 @ 6:17 PM 
 

Something that bothers me a little

 

.Net remoting is officially discouraged now, right? So, we’re all supposed to just quit that and go to web services because they are the standard. Who cares about ‘performance’ and ‘TCP channels’, because we’re trying to write services that inter-operate with the world… So, why does Microsoft still use TCP/proprietary remoting to connect to SQL Server? This surely should be the ONE place they’d like to make a good example for everyone to follow… right? Huh. Well, I don’t like it. I’m calling foobar on them. I’d be willing to bet my lunch money that the reason they haven’t switched is for performance, and to FORCE platform dependence. What if I just want that performance? What if I WANT people to have to use my client to talk to my server? Is that possible?

Tags Categories: .NET Coding Posted By: Dave
Last Edit: 11 Dec 2006 @ 06 27 PM

E-mailPermalink
 

Responses to this post » (None)

 


Comments are open. Feel free to leave a comment below.


 Comment Meta:
RSS Feed for comments
TrackBack URI
 

Leave A Comment ...

 

 XHTML:
You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
\/ More Options ...
Change Theme...
  • Role »
  • Posts »
  • Comments »
Change Theme...
  • VoidVoid (Default)
  • LifeLife
  • EarthEarth
  • WindWind
  • WaterWater
  • FireFire
  • LiteLightweight
  • No Child Pages...