RE: Breaking the rules of C# : After thought…

I noticed that I’m not the only one dissatisfied with the way that C# chooses overloads (Defaulting to the most ambiguously matching overload) In fact, these guys have a whole language (Nemerle) that sort of fixes all the stupid things about C# by making native the features that SHOULD have been included in C#1.0. (That isn’t their stated goal, but it seems to be the case in a lot of places… ) Looks like in a little while I’ll have to learn to grok nemerle… once things settle down for a bit, of course.